Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kris Van Wyk vs Faisal Qamar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wyk vs Qamar analysis and find out who is favored!
Kris Van Wyk vs Faisal Qamar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wyk 1 - 0 Qamar
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wyk has won 48.99% of points on his second serve, while Qamar has won 49.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wyk, in recent form, has won 53.13% of his opponent's second serve points, while Qamar has won 47.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.25% and 33.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wyk has saved 54.2% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Qamar has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wyk has won 62.89% of matches played (W/L 61/ 36), with Qamar winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wyk has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 148/ 82), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Qamar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 55/ 43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Wyk has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.13% of matches (W/L 59/ 33), where as Qamar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 6/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wyk winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wyk winning 2 and Qamar winning 0. The last match between Wyk and Qamar was at the M25 Mandya, 10-01-2024, First, Hard with Kris Van Wyk getting the victory 6-1 7-6(2).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wyk and Qamar have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wyk winning 0 times and Qamar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Wyk winning 1, and Qamar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wyk has played against opponents with an average rank of 112.03 while Qamar has played against players with an average rank of 12.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wyk has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Qamar has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wyk has converted 46.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Qamar has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wyk 1 - 0 Qamar
423
Rank
365
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
64% (149-84)
Career Total W/L
55% (71-57)
63% (27-16)
YTD W/L
50% (3-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kris Van Wyk | Faisal Qamar |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:0 | 1:46:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 47% (34/73) | 61% (44/72) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (27/34) | 57% (25/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (21/39) | 50% (14/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 14% (1/7) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (33/72) | 34% (25/73) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Faisal Qamar
47%
(
34 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
9
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
6
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kris Van Wyk | Faisal Qamar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (27/16) | 50% (3/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (57/42) | 43% (6/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (487/418) | 52% (77/70) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (27/16) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.46 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 203 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 185 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:31 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 128.19 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1676/2830) | 62% (86/139) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1130/1676) | 60% (52/86) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (569/1154) | 49% (26/53) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (161/347) | 33% (5/15) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1298/2968) | 40% (58/144) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (25/14) | 50% (3/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (26/42) | 50% (3/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (10/14) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (22/21) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (22/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 24% (21/5) | 25% (4/1) |
Kris Van Wyk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jesse Flores
Player
Kris Van Wyk
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Mousa Alkotop
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vladyslav Orlov
Player
Kris Van Wyk
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
72%
(
72 of
100)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
53 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Karan Singh
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
33 of
39)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
66
|
5-7 7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Rohan Mehra
50%
(
39 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
4
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Kris Van Wyk
70%
(
71 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
36 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
107
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Diogo Marques
59%
(
62 of
105)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
94)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
46 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Jordan Chiu
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
1-6 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Faisal Qamar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Faisal Qamar
47%
(
34 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
9
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
6
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Faisal Qamar
Player
Jiayang Dong
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 4-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-4 10-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Vishnu Vardhan
Player
Faisal Qamar
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Faisal Qamar
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
8 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Faisal Qamar
Player
Ha Minh Duc Vu
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Wyk Vs Qamar Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
